Re: identify the race condition in this code and win the respect of linux-rdma developers!
From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-16 19:57:34
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 07:36:17PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote:
I was suggesting that there were only 2 states, not 3, with ibv_get_cq_event() simply retrieving a queued event from the kernel without touching the CQ state.
But that isn't true, as you point out in your next message ibv_get_cq_event calls mlx4_cq_event which does alter the CQ state, particularly in how it behaves WRT to mlx4_arm_cq. Hard to say what the arm_sn does, but my guess is that it is creating a one-shot that is sensitive to ibv_get_cq_event, eg you will never get more than one event queued in the kernel queue, which creates the 3 state system I described.. (at least that matches my experience) Certainly, considering that arm_sn is a 3 bit counter, calling mlx4_cq_event many times then calling arm_cq will alias the counter from the point of view of the chip and that can't possibly be good.
I changed the code to do this:
do {
poll
rearm
poll
get_event
} while (1);
which I believe fixes the issue.In the past I looked at all this and concluded this was the only possible correct way to write the loop. You have to guarentee rearm is called before every get_event and you have to do a poll after every rearm.
Thanks for the help. You are now the winner of my respect. :)
NP :) Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html