Re: [libibmad] field name cleanup

On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:32:56 -0700
Hal Rosenstock [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Al,

On 8/2/2011 8:10 PM, Albert Chu wrote:

quoted

I noticed that a number of field names did not have the "_F" suffix on
them. The patch below cleans this up and makes things consistent.

I think the ship has sailed on this due to backward compatibility. IMO
the best that could be done now is to add the _F suffixes to be the same
as the ones without them.

For example,
...
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1_F = IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2_F = IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2,
...

I don't think so.  The last version (tag 1.3.7, released 2/14/2011) does not include IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1.  So I think we can still change them before the release.

I think that is true of all the fields in the patch but I will check again.

Ira

-- Hal

quoted

Al

-- 
Ira Weiny
Math Programmer/Computer Scientist
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
925-423-8008
weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html