Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-08-03

Re: [libibmad] field name cleanup

From: Hal Rosenstock <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-03 07:32:56

Hi Al,

On 8/2/2011 8:10 PM, Albert Chu wrote:
I noticed that a number of field names did not have the "_F" suffix on
them. The patch below cleans this up and makes things consistent.
I think the ship has sailed on this due to backward compatibility. IMO
the best that could be done now is to add the _F suffixes to be the same
as the ones without them.

For example,
...
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1_F = IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS1,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2,
	IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2_F = IB_PC_PORT_VL_OP_PACKETS2,
...

-- Hal
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help