Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-08-02

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libibverbs: Allow 3rd party extensions to verb routines

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-02 16:56:52

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 10:53:05AM +0300, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
These additions would include the new ibv_cmd_xxx functions
(the core functions reside in src/cmd.c), and new, additional, enum values of
the form IBV_USER_VERBS_CMD_XXXX, of which the core enum is in file
include/infiniband/kern_abi.h.
I believe the only case where using an extension would make sense if
it if can be implemented entirely within the low level driver. So you
can't add new ibv_cmd calls to ibverbs, must duplicate them in your
driver, etc.

I'm a little unclear on how the application is going to get the access
enums and other structure definitions, though.. I suppose the low
level driver can install a .h file as well.
 
Each new third-party package would need such a library.  While this
will lead to a multiplicity of new libraries (one per addition), the
core libibverbs package would remain as is.
I definitely don't want to see this..

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help