Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-02-23

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improved node descriptions

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-23 05:41:52

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:03:29PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Doing it in userspace makes generating the node description changed
trap simpler?
Hmm... how many places can do sethostname()?  Seems easier to
catch in the kernel than hook every place in userspace.  (Although
there's no kernel hook right now)  I do agree it would be good to
have some idea of how we could generate the "node desc changed"
trap at appropriate times.
Wasn't thinking about 100% perfection, just if DHCP is the concern it
shouldn't be hard to hook that one place.
quoted
I just wonder if this is a big pain to do right, what about charsets, IDN,
and ugly details like that?
Does anyone expect to care about non-ASCII node descs?
What can we sensibly do except take what we're given?
node desc is UTF-8, hostname is IDNA, a conversion is required, see RFC
3490.

Does anyone care? Who knows, but very pedantically it is wrong to just copy
the host name byte by byte. I only mention it to point out that it is 
trivial to do what Mike did, somewhat harder to do % escaping like you
suggest and solve the multiple HCA problem, harder still to trap
sethostname() and generate a trap, and extra special hard to correctly
handle character sets on top of all that. :)

So, is it still trivial to do it in the kernel?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help