Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2023-12-20

Re: Performance drop due to alloc_workqueue() misuse and recent change

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-12-20 07:15:02
Also in: ceph-devel, cgroups, dm-devel, dri-devel, gfs2, intel-gfx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-bcachefs, linux-block, linux-btrfs, linux-cifs, linux-crypto, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fscrypt, linux-iommu, linux-media, linux-mediatek, linux-mm, linux-mmc, linux-nfs, linux-nvme, linux-rdma, linux-remoteproc, linux-scsi, linux-trace-kernel, linux-usb, linux-wireless, linux-xfs, lkml, netdev, platform-driver-x86, target-devel, virtualization

Hello, again.

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:03:47PM +0000, Naohiro Aota wrote:
...
In summary, we misuse max_active, considering it is a global limit. And,
the recent commit introduced a huge performance drop in some cases.  We
need to review alloc_workqueue() usage to check if its max_active setting
is proper or not.
Can you please test the following branch?

 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git unbound-system-wide-max_active

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help