Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2023-08-13

Re: [PATCH -next] md/raid10: fix a 'conf->barrier' leakage in raid10_takeover()

From: Paul Menzel <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-31 05:50:35
Also in: lkml

Dear Yu,


Thank you for your patch. Some minor style comments for the commit 
message, you can also ignore.

Am 31.07.23 um 04:28 schrieb Yu Kuai:
From: Yu Kuai <redacted>

After commit 4d27e927344a ("md: don't quiesce in mddev_suspend()"),
'conf->barrier' will be leaked in the case that raid10 takeover raid0:

level_store
  pers->takeover -> raid10_takeover
   raid10_takeover_raid0
    WRITE_ONCE(conf->barrier, 1)

mddev_suspend
// still raid0
mddev->pers = pers
// switch to raid10
mddev_resume
// resume without suspend

After the above commit, mddev_resume() will not decrease 'conf->barrier'
that is set in raid10_takeover_raid0().

Fix this problem by remove the setting of 'conf->barrier' from
removing

or

… by not setting `conf->barrier` in …
raid10_takeover_raid0().

By the way, this problem is found while I'm trying to make
mddev_suspend/resume() to be independent from raid personalities. rai10
rai*d*
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
is the only personality to use reference count in the quiesce() callback
and this problem is only related to raid10.

Fixes: 4d27e927344a ("md: don't quiesce in mddev_suspend()")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <redacted>
---
  drivers/md/raid10.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 16aa9d735880..7704a4c7f469 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -4417,7 +4417,6 @@ static void *raid10_takeover_raid0(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t size, int devs)
  				rdev->new_raid_disk = rdev->raid_disk * 2;
  				rdev->sectors = size;
  			}
-		WRITE_ONCE(conf->barrier, 1);
  	}
  
  	return conf;
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <redacted>


Kind regards,

Paul
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help