Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2023-07-07

Re: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: optimize fix_read_error

From: Yu Kuai <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-26 02:28:19
Also in: lkml

Hi,

在 2023/06/24 1:32, linan666@huaweicloud.com 写道:
From: Li Nan <redacted>

We dereference r10_bio->read_slot too many times in fix_read_error().
Optimize it by using a variable to store read_slot.
Other than a nit below, this patch LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <redacted>
---
  drivers/md/raid10.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 381c21f7fb06..94ae294c8a3c 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2725,10 +2725,10 @@ static int r10_sync_page_io(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t sector,
  static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
  {
  	int sect = 0; /* Offset from r10_bio->sector */
-	int sectors = r10_bio->sectors;
+	int sectors = r10_bio->sectors, slot = r10_bio->read_slot;
  	struct md_rdev *rdev;
  	int max_read_errors = atomic_read(&mddev->max_corr_read_errors);
-	int d = r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].devnum;
+	int d = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum;
  
  	/* still own a reference to this rdev, so it cannot
  	 * have been cleared recently.
@@ -2749,13 +2749,13 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
  		pr_notice("md/raid10:%s: %pg: Failing raid device\n",
  			  mdname(mddev), rdev->bdev);
  		md_error(mddev, rdev);
-		r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].bio = IO_BLOCKED;
+		r10_bio->devs[slot].bio = IO_BLOCKED;
  		return;
  	}
  
  	while(sectors) {
  		int s = sectors;
-		int sl = r10_bio->read_slot;
+		int sl = slot;
  		int success = 0;
  		int start;
  
@@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
  			sl++;
  			if (sl == conf->copies)
  				sl = 0;
-		} while (!success && sl != r10_bio->read_slot);
+		} while (!success && sl != slot);
  		rcu_read_unlock();
  
  		if (!success) {
@@ -2798,16 +2798,16 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
  			 * as bad on the first device to discourage future
  			 * reads.
  			 */
-			int dn = r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].devnum;
+			int dn = r10_bio->devs[slot].devnum;
  			rdev = conf->mirrors[dn].rdev;
  
  			if (!rdev_set_badblocks(
  				    rdev,
-				    r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].addr
+				    r10_bio->devs[slot].addr
  				    + sect,
  				    s, 0)) {
  				md_error(mddev, rdev);
-				r10_bio->devs[r10_bio->read_slot].bio
+				r10_bio->devs[slot].bio
  					= IO_BLOCKED;
There is no need to split lines now.

Thanks,
Kuai
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
  			}
  			break;
@@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
  		start = sl;
  		/* write it back and re-read */
  		rcu_read_lock();
-		while (sl != r10_bio->read_slot) {
+		while (sl != slot) {
  			if (sl==0)
  				sl = conf->copies;
  			sl--;
@@ -2850,7 +2850,7 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10
  			rcu_read_lock();
  		}
  		sl = start;
-		while (sl != r10_bio->read_slot) {
+		while (sl != slot) {
  			if (sl==0)
  				sl = conf->copies;
  			sl--;
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help