Re: [PATCH - mdadm] mdopen: always try create_named_array()
From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-22 03:25:06
Also in:
lkml, regressions
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023, Xiao Ni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:08 AM NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
mdopen() will use create_named_array() to ask the kernel to create the given md array, but only if it is given a number or name. If it is NOT given a name and is required to choose one itself using find_free_devnm() it does NOT use create_named_array(). On kernels with CONFIG_BLOCK_LEGACY_AUTOLOAD not set, this can result in failure to assemble an array. This can particularly seen when the "name" of the array begins with a host name different to the name of the host running the command. So add the missing call to create_named_array(). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217074Hi Neil I have two questions, hope you can help to understand the function create_mddev better. Frist, from the comment7 of the bug you mentioned: There are two different sorts names. Note that you almost acknowledged this by writing "name for my md device node" while the documentation only talks about names for "md devices", not for "md device nodes". There are 1/ there are names in /dev or /dev/md/ (device nodes) 2/ there are names that appear in /proc/mdstat and in /sys/block/ (devices) Thanks for the clarification. But it looks like it doesn't work like what you said. For example: mdadm -CR /dev/md/root -l0 -n2 /dev/sda /dev/sdc --name=test cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid0] md127 : active raid0 sdc[1] sda[0] 3906764800 blocks super 1.2 512k chunks cd /sys/block/md127/md/ In /proc/mdstat and /sys/block, they all use md127 rather than the name(root)
Try again with "CREATE names=yes" in /etc/mdadm.conf. mdadm generally tries to keep: - the names in /dev/ - the names in /dev/md/ - the names in /proc/mdstat - the names stored in the metadata in sync. It can only do this when: - you enabled "names=yes" - you don't confuse it by specifying a device name (/dev/md/root) that is different from the metadata names "test". If you don't have "names=yes" then the name in /proc/mdstat and the name in /dev/md* will be numeric. The name in /dev/md/ and the name in the metadata can be different and will usually be the same. If you explicitly give a different name with --name= than the device name then obviously they will be different. If you then stop the array and restart with "mdadm -As" or "mdadm -I /dev/sda; mdadm -I /dev/sdb" then mdadm will create a name in /dev/md/ that matches the name in the metadata.
Before this patch, it creates a symbol link with the name root rather than test ll /dev/md/root lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 8 Mar 21 22:35 /dev/md/root -> ../md127
That is what you asked it to do.
So "test" which is specified by --name looks like it has little usage.
It is stored in the metadata. You can see it in --examine output. If you reassemble the array without specifying a device name, it will use the name "test".
By the way, after this patch, the symbol link /dev/md/root can't be created anymore. Is it a regression problem?
I cannot reproduce any problem like that. Please provide a sequence of steps so that I can try to duplicate it.
Second, are there possibilities that the arguments "dev" and "name" of function create_mddev are null at the same time?
No. For Build or Create, dev is never NULL. For Assemble and Incremental, name is never NULL.
After some tests, I found dev can't be null when creating a raid device. It can be checked before calling create_mddev. And we must get a name after creating a raid device. So when assembling a raid device, the name must not be null. So the dev and name can't be null at the same time, right?
Correct. NeilBrown
Best Regards Xiaoquoted
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <redacted> --- mdopen.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/mdopen.c b/mdopen.c index d18c931996d2..810f79a3d19a 100644 --- a/mdopen.c +++ b/mdopen.c@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ int create_mddev(char *dev, char *name, int autof, int trustworthy, } if (block_udev) udev_block(devnm); + create_named_array(devnm); } sprintf(devname, "/dev/%s", devnm); --2.39.2