Re: [PATCH 05/10] super0: refactor the code for enum
From: Jes Sorensen <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-22 18:21:05
On 9/22/22 07:21, Kusiak, Mateusz wrote:
On 14/09/2022 17:03, Coly Li wrote:quoted
quoted
2022年8月18日 22:56,Mateusz Kusiak [off-list ref] 写道:[snipped]quoted
@@ -628,29 +659,15 @@ static int update_super0(struct supertype *st, struct mdinfo *info,sb->disks[info->disk.number].minor = info->disk.minor; sb->disks[info->disk.number].raid_disk = info->disk.raid_disk; sb->disks[info->disk.number].state = info->disk.state; - } else if (strcmp(update, "resync") == 0) { - /* make sure resync happens */ + break; + case UOPT_RESYNC: + /** + *make sure resync happens + */The above change doesn’t follow existing code style for comments. How about using the previous one line version?Personaly, I'd rather change it from "/**" to "/*". I think we should gradually adapt the code to kernel coding style. Are you fine with that?
Kernel style is good, but that would be either /* foo comment */ or /* * bar comment */ Thanks, Jes
quoted
[snipped] Thanks. Coly Li