Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2022-09-19

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] md: Remove extra mddev_get() in md_seq_start()

From: Paul Menzel <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-09 04:53:44
Also in: lkml

Dear Logan,


Thank you for the updated series. One nit below, which could be 
corrected by the maintainer before applying.

Am 08.09.22 um 18:15 schrieb Logan Gunthorpe:
A regression is seen where mddev devices stay permanently after they
are stopped due to an elevated reference count.

This was tracked down to an extra mddev_get() in md_seq_start().

It only happened rarely because most of the time the md_seq_start()
is called with a zero offset. The path with an extra mddev_get() only
happens when it starts with a non-zero offset.

The commit noted below changed an mddev_get() to check its success
but inadevrtantly left the original call in. Remove the extra call.
inadvertently
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fixes: 12a6caf27324 ("md: only delete entries from all_mddevs when the disk is freed")
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>
---
  drivers/md/md.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index afaf36b2f6ab..9dc0175280b4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8154,7 +8154,6 @@ static void *md_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
  	list_for_each(tmp,&all_mddevs)
  		if (!l--) {
  			mddev = list_entry(tmp, struct mddev, all_mddevs);
-			mddev_get(mddev);
  			if (!mddev_get(mddev))
  				continue;
  			spin_unlock(&all_mddevs_lock);

Kind regards,

Paul
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help