On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 1:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Also please test the following one too:
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 5ee62b95f3e5..d01c64be08e2 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1991,7 +1991,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx, struct list_head *list,
if (!needs_restart ||
(no_tag && list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch_wait.entry)))
blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
- else if (needs_restart && needs_resource)
+ else if (needs_restart && (needs_resource ||
+ blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags)))
blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, BLK_MQ_RESOURCE_DELAY);
blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, true);
Should I test both patches at the same time, or separately? On top of v5.17 clean, or with b6e68ee82585 still reverted?
--
Chris Murphy