[PATCH] block: Fix spelling mistakes in comments
From: Zhang Jiaming <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-04 10:06:09
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
software raid (multiple disks) support, the rest · Maintainers:
Song Liu, Yu Kuai, Linus Torvalds
Fix spelling of dones't and waitting in comments. Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <redacted> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <redacted> --- drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 83c184eddbda..4b799005eb6e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct r5l_log { * reclaimed. if it's 0, reclaim spaces * used by io_units which are in * IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END state (eg, reclaim - * dones't wait for specific io_unit + * doesn't wait for specific io_unit * switching to IO_UNIT_STRIPE_END * state) */ wait_queue_head_t iounit_wait;
@@ -1327,9 +1327,9 @@ static void r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(struct r5l_log *log, * superblock is updated to new log tail. Updating superblock (either * directly call md_update_sb() or depend on md thread) must hold * reconfig mutex. On the other hand, raid5_quiesce is called with - * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waitting - * for all IO finish, hence waitting for reclaim thread, while reclaim - * thread is calling this function and waitting for reconfig mutex. So + * reconfig_mutex hold. The first step of raid5_quiesce() is waiting + * for all IO finish, hence waiting for reclaim thread, while reclaim + * thread is calling this function and waiting for reconfig mutex. So * there is a deadlock. We workaround this issue with a trylock. * FIXME: we could miss discard if we can't take reconfig mutex */
--
2.34.1