Thread (44 messages) 44 messages, 9 authors, 2022-06-02
STALE1498d

[PATCH 2/2] md: protect md_unregister_thread from reentrancy

From: Guoqing Jiang <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-05 08:20:01
Subsystem: software raid (multiple disks) support, the rest · Maintainers: Song Liu, Yu Kuai, Linus Torvalds

From: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>

Generally, the md_unregister_thread is called with reconfig_mutex, but
raid_message in dm-raid doesn't hold reconfig_mutex to unregister thread,
so md_unregister_thread can be called simulitaneously from two call sites
in theory.

Then after previous commit which remove the protection of reconfig_mutex
for md_unregister_thread completely, the potential issue could be worse
than before.

Let's take pers_lock at the beginning of function to ensure reentrancy.

Reported-by: Donald Buczek <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index a70e7f0f9268..c401e063bec8 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7962,17 +7962,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_register_thread);
 
 void md_unregister_thread(struct md_thread **threadp)
 {
-	struct md_thread *thread = *threadp;
-	if (!thread)
-		return;
-	pr_debug("interrupting MD-thread pid %d\n", task_pid_nr(thread->tsk));
-	/* Locking ensures that mddev_unlock does not wake_up a
+	struct md_thread *thread;
+
+	/*
+	 * Locking ensures that mddev_unlock does not wake_up a
 	 * non-existent thread
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&pers_lock);
+	thread = *threadp;
+	if (!thread) {
+		spin_unlock(&pers_lock);
+		return;
+	}
 	*threadp = NULL;
 	spin_unlock(&pers_lock);
 
+	pr_debug("interrupting MD-thread pid %d\n", task_pid_nr(thread->tsk));
 	kthread_stop(thread->tsk);
 	kfree(thread);
 }
-- 
2.31.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help