Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 6 authors, 2022-03-07
STALE1572d LANDED

[PATCH 02/10] block: remove handle_bad_sector

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2022-03-04 18:01:21
Also in: dm-devel, linux-block, linux-ext4
Subsystem: block layer, the rest · Maintainers: Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds

Use the %pg format specifier instead of the stack hungry bdevname
function, and remove handle_bad_sector given that it is not pointless.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 block/blk-core.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 34e1b7fdb7c89..4d858fc08f8ba 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -540,17 +540,6 @@ bool blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_get_queue);
 
-static void handle_bad_sector(struct bio *bio, sector_t maxsector)
-{
-	char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
-
-	pr_info_ratelimited("%s: attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
-			    "%s: rw=%d, want=%llu, limit=%llu\n",
-			    current->comm,
-			    bio_devname(bio, b), bio->bi_opf,
-			    bio_end_sector(bio), maxsector);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST
 
 static DECLARE_FAULT_ATTR(fail_make_request);
@@ -612,7 +601,11 @@ static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio)
 	if (nr_sectors && maxsector &&
 	    (nr_sectors > maxsector ||
 	     bio->bi_iter.bi_sector > maxsector - nr_sectors)) {
-		handle_bad_sector(bio, maxsector);
+		pr_info_ratelimited("%s: attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
+				    "%pg: rw=%d, want=%llu, limit=%llu\n",
+				    current->comm,
+				    bio->bi_bdev, bio->bi_opf,
+				    bio_end_sector(bio), maxsector);
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.30.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help