Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] md/raid5: set STRIPE_SIZE as a configurable value
From: Yufen Yu <hidden>
Date: 2020-05-29 11:49:19
On 2020/5/29 6:07, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
On 5/27/20 3:19 PM, Yufen Yu wrote:quoted
Hi, all For now, STRIPE_SIZE is equal to the value of PAGE_SIZE. That means, RAID5 will issus echo bio to disk at least 64KB when PAGE_SIZE is 64KB in arm64. However, filesystem usually issue bio in the unit of 4KB. Then, RAID5 will waste resource of disk bandwidth.Could you explain a little bit about "waste resource"? Does it mean the chance for full stripe write is limited because of the incompatible between fs (4KB bio) and raid5 (64KB stripe unit)?
Applications may request 4KB data, but RAID5 will issue 64KB size bio to disk, which will waste disk bandwidth and more cpu time to compute xor. Detail performance data can see in previous email: https://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg64261.html
quoted
To solve the problem, this patchset provide a new config CONFIG_MD_RAID456_STRIPE_SHIFT to let user config STRIPE_SIZE. The default value is 1, means 4096(1<<9). Normally, using default STRIPE_SIZE can get better performance. And NeilBrown have suggested just to fix the STRIPE_SIZE as 4096.But, out test result show that big value of STRIPE_SIZE may have better performance when size of issued IOs are mostly bigger than 4096. Thus, in this patchset, we still want to set STRIPE_SIZE as a configureable value.I think it is better to define stripe size as 4K if it fits to generally scenario, and also aligns with fs.quoted
In current implementation, grow_buffers() uses alloc_page() to allocate the buffers for each stripe_head. With the change, it means we allocate 64K buffers but just use 4K of them. To save memory, we try to 'compress' multiple buffers of stripe_head to only one real page. Detail shows in patch #2. To evaluate the new feature, we create raid5 device '/dev/md5' with 4 SSD disk and test it on arm64 machine with 64KB PAGE_SIZE. 1) We format /dev/md5 with mkfs.ext4 and mount ext4 with default configure on /mnt directory. Then, trying to test it by dbench with command: dbench -D /mnt -t 1000 10. Result show as: 'STRIPE_SHIFT = 64KB' Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 9805011 0.021 64.728 Close 7202525 0.001 0.120 Rename 415213 0.051 44.681 Unlink 1980066 0.079 93.147 Deltree 240 1.793 6.516 Mkdir 120 0.004 0.007 Qpathinfo 8887512 0.007 37.114 Qfileinfo 1557262 0.001 0.030 Qfsinfo 1629582 0.012 0.152 Sfileinfo 798756 0.040 57.641 Find 3436004 0.019 57.782 WriteX 4887239 0.021 57.638 ReadX 15370483 0.005 37.818 LockX 31934 0.003 0.022 UnlockX 31933 0.001 0.021 Flush 687205 13.302 530.088 Throughput 307.799 MB/sec 10 clients 10 procs max_latency=530.091 ms ------------------------------------------------------- 'STRIPE_SIZE = 4KB' Operation Count AvgLat MaxLat ---------------------------------------- NTCreateX 11999166 0.021 36.380 Close 8814128 0.001 0.122 Rename 508113 0.051 29.169 Unlink 2423242 0.070 38.141 Deltree 300 1.885 7.155 Mkdir 150 0.004 0.006 Qpathinfo 10875921 0.007 35.485 Qfileinfo 1905837 0.001 0.032 Qfsinfo 1994304 0.012 0.125 Sfileinfo 977450 0.029 26.489 Find 4204952 0.019 9.361 WriteX 5981890 0.019 27.804 ReadX 18809742 0.004 33.491 LockX 39074 0.003 0.025 UnlockX 39074 0.001 0.014 Flush 841022 10.712 458.848 Throughput 376.777 MB/sec 10 clients 10 procs max_latency=458.852 ms -------------------------------------------------------What is the default io unit size of dbench?
Since dbench runs on ext4 filesystem, so I think most io size is about 4KB.
quoted
2) We try to evaluate IO throughput for /dev/md5 by fio with config: [4KB randwrite] direct=1 numjob=2 iodepth=64 ioengine=libaio filename=/dev/md5 bs=4KB rw=randwrite [64KB write] direct=1 numjob=2 iodepth=64 ioengine=libaio filename=/dev/md5 bs=1MB rw=write The fio test result as follow: + + | STRIPE_SIZE(64KB) | STRIPE_SIZE(4KB) +----------------------------------------------------+ 4KB randwrite | 15MB/s | 100MB/s +----------------------------------------------------+ 1MB write | 1000MB/s | 700MB/s The result show that when size of io is bigger than 4KB (64KB), 64KB STRIPE_SIZE has much higher IOPS. But for 4KB randwrite, that means, size of io issued to device are smaller, 4KB STRIPE_SIZE have better performance.The 4k rand write performance drops from 100MB/S to 15MB/S?! How about other io sizes? Say 16k, 64K and 256K etc, it would be more convincing if 64KB stripe has better performance than 4KB stripe overall.
Maybe I have not explain clearly. Here, the fio test result shows that 4KB STRIPE_SIZE is not always have better performance. If applications request IO size mostly are bigger than 4KB, likely 1MB in test, set STRIPE_SIZE with a bigger value can get better performance. So, we try to provide a configurable STRIPE_SIZE, rather than fix STRIPE_SIZE as 4096. Thanks, Yufen