Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2019-09-22
STALE2563d

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 25/89] md: don't call spare_active in md_reap_sync_thread if all member devices can't work

From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: 2019-09-22 19:12:47
Also in: lkml, stable
Subsystem: software raid (multiple disks) support, the rest · Maintainers: Song Liu, Yu Kuai, Linus Torvalds

From: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>

[ Upstream commit 0d8ed0e9bf9643f27f4816dca61081784dedb38d ]

When add one disk to array, the md_reap_sync_thread is responsible
to activate the spare and set In_sync flag for the new member in
spare_active().

But if raid1 has one member disk A, and disk B is added to the array.
Then we offline A before all the datas are synchronized from A to B,
obviously B doesn't have the latest data as A, but B is still marked
with In_sync flag.

So let's not call spare_active under the condition, otherwise B is
still showed with 'U' state which is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/md/md.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 764ed9c466294..d185725e100c0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8906,7 +8906,8 @@ void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
 	/* resync has finished, collect result */
 	md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
 	if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) &&
-	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery)) {
+	    !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery) &&
+	    mddev->degraded != mddev->raid_disks) {
 		/* success...*/
 		/* activate any spares */
 		if (mddev->pers->spare_active(mddev)) {
-- 
2.20.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help