Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2018-06-04

Re: Introduce atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2018-05-30 09:26:25
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On 2018-05-23 15:02:41 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
1,5-6:
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
I sucked them into my try tree an noticed this off by one, I applied the
tags to 1,4-5:
*┬─>[PATCH 1/5] spinlock: atomic_dec_and_lock: Add an irqsave variant
 ├─>[PATCH 2/5] mm/backing-dev: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()
 ├─>[PATCH 3/5] kernel/user: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()
*├─>[PATCH 4/5] drivers/md/raid5: Use irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock()
*├─>[PATCH 5/5] drivers/md/raid5: Do not disable irq on release_inactive_stripe_list() call

as we talked about it.

Sebastian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help