Re: FW: change in disk failure policy for non-BBL arrays?
From: Chris Walker <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-06 13:42:50
Perfect, thanks very much Artur. Chris On 11/6/17 3:14 AM, Artur Paszkiewicz wrote:
On 11/03/2017 08:58 PM, Chris Walker wrote:quoted
Hello, I was looking at this again today and it appears that with this change, error handling no longer works correctly in RAID10 (I haven't checked the other levels yet). Without a BBL configured, an error cycles through fix_read_error until max_read_errors is exceeded, and only then is the drive kicked out of the array. For example, if I inject errors in response to both read and write commands at sector 16392 of /dev/sda, logs in response to a read of the corresponding md0 sector look like: (many repeats) Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: unable to read back corrected sectors (8 sectors at 16392 on sda) Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: read correction write failed (8 sectors at 16392 on sda) Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: unable to read back corrected sectors (8 sectors at 16392 on sda) Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: failing drive Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: Raid device exceeded read_error threshold [cur 21:max 20] Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: sda: Failing raid device Oct 27 16:15:16 c1 kernel: md/raid10:md0: Disk failure on sda, disabling device. Previously, the drive would have been failed out of the array by the call of md_error at the end of r10_sync_page_io. Is there an appetite for a patch that takes the easy way out by reverting to the previous behavior with changes like - if (!rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, sector, sectors, 0)) + if (!rdev_set_badblocks(rdev, sector, sectors, 0) || rdev->badblocks.shift < 0)Hi, Some time ago I sent a patch that fixed this issue but now I see that it never got applied: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=145986120124345&w=2. I'll resend it and hopefully it gets applied this time. Thanks, Artur