Re: RAID header in XFS area?
From: Reindl Harald <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-04 20:36:09
From: Reindl Harald <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-04 20:36:09
Am 04.11.2017 um 20:27 schrieb Wol's lists:
On 04/11/17 18:34, Reindl Harald wrote:quoted
quoted
What's happened is that mdadm has assembled the array, realised a disk is missing, AND STOPPED.why would it be supposed that a simple mirror with a mising disk is stopped while the whole point of mirroring is to not care about one of the disks dying?While the system is RUNNING, yes. But if the array is STOPPED, mdadm will refuse to start it. At least, that's certainly how I understand it works ... Do you REALLY want the system to be running, and give you no clue that it's not working properly?
mdmon typically writes a mail about a degraded array - so far away from "no clue"