Re: Raid 6 recovery
From: Wols Lists <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-31 16:27:42
On 31/10/17 15:42, John Crisp wrote:
Hi, Returning once again to this list for some help and advice.
Doing a first-responder job ... :-)
Long story short I have a failed Raid 6 array that I would like to try and recover. The data is not vitally important as I have most of it in a number of other places, but I'd like to try and resurrect the array if possible, as much to learn as anything.
Looks very promising ...
The array had an issue some while ago, but as I had no space to store any recovered data I left the machine off. The OS is Xubuntu 14.04 The system consisted of a boot/OS array with two mirrored drives (which is fine), and then a Raid 6 data array which consisted of 8 300Gb Ultra Wide SCSI drives. 7 were in the array with a spare (if my memory serves me correctly).
Okay. That makes 5 data drives, 2 parity, one spare. I'm wondering if one drive failed a while back and was rebuilt, so you didn't have the spare you think you did. I'm half-hoping that's the case, because if it fell over in the middle of a rebuild, that could be a problem ...
As far as I remember the machine suffered a power failure. When it powered up again, the system tried to restore/rebuild the array. During this I think the power failed again (don't ask.....) It suffered at lest one disk failure. I then left it off to try another day. Drive layout is as follows: RAID 1 mirror /dev/sda + b RAID 6 array /dev/sd[cdefghij] /dev/sdd was dead and has been replaced.
As far as I remember I created the array, then added a partition and then LVM (possibly not a good idea in hindsight). So none of the individual drives show a partition...... I had a good read here and created some of the scripts. https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Recovering_a_damaged_RAID Here is some of the output I have got so far. Any advice appreciated. B. Rgds John root@garage:~# sed -e '/^[[:space:]]*$/d' -e '/^[[:space:]]*#/d' /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes HOMEHOST <system> MAILADDR root DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=1.2 name=garage:0 UUID=90624393:3b638ad8:9aeb81ca:fa3caafc ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=1.2 name=garage:1 UUID=f624610a:b711ff4b:3b126550:a8f78732 ARRAY /dev/md/Data metadata=1.2 name=garage:Data UUID=1a2f92b0:d7c1a540:165b9ab7:0baed449 cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [raid10] md127 : inactive sdf[3](S) sdh[5](S) 585675356 blocks super 1.2 md1 : active raid1 sda5[2] sdb5[3] 292674368 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sda1[2] sdb1[3] 248640 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> mdadm --stop /dev/md127 Notice the following will not work with /dev/sdc1 as there is no partition on the drive. Have to use /dev/sdc : UUID=$(mdadm -E /dev/sdc|perl -ne '/Array UUID : (\S+)/ and print $1') echo $UUID 1a2f92b0:d7c1a540:165b9ab7:0baed449 DEVICES=$(cat /proc/partitions | parallel --tagstring {5} --colsep ' +' mdadm -E /dev/{5} |grep $UUID | parallel --colsep '\t' echo /dev/{1}) echo $DEVICES /dev/sdc /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdh /dev/sdi Create overlays: root@garage:~# ./overlayoptions.sh create Currently set device are /dev/sdc /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdh /dev/sdi Input is create Creating Overlay free 235071M Clear any old overlays Removing Overlay /dev/sdc 286102M /dev/loop0 /dev/mapper/sdc /dev/sde 286102M /dev/loop1 /dev/mapper/sde /dev/sdf 286102M /dev/loop2 /dev/mapper/sdf /dev/sdh 286102M /dev/loop3 /dev/mapper/sdh /dev/sdi 286102M /dev/loop4 /dev/mapper/sdi root@garage:~# mdadm --assemble --force /dev/md127 $OVERLAYS mdadm: clearing FAULTY flag for device 3 in /dev/md127 for /dev/mapper/sdh mdadm: Marking array /dev/md127 as 'clean' mdadm: failed to add /dev/mapper/sde to /dev/md127: Invalid argument mdadm: failed to add /dev/mapper/sdi to /dev/md127: Invalid argument mdadm: /dev/md127 assembled from 2 drives and 1 rebuilding - not enough to start the array.
This worries me. We have 5 drives, which would normally be enough to recreate the array - a quick "--force" and we're up and running. Except one drive is rebuilding, so we have one drive's worth of data scattered across two drives :-( Examine tells us that sdd, sdg, and sdj have been partitioned. What does "fdisk -l" tell us about those drives? Assuming they have one large partition each, what does "--examine" tell us about sdd1, sdg1 and sdj1 (assuming that's what the partitions are)?
root@garage:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sd[cdefghij] |grep Event
Events : 1911
Events : 1911
Events : 1910
Events : 1910
Events : 1911
(Two drives have older Events)Do you mean the two with 1910? That's no great shakes.
root@garage:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sd[cdefghij] /dev/sdc:
Snip the details ... :-) First things first, I'd suggest going out and getting a 3TB drive. Once we've worked out where the data is hiding on sdd, sdg, and sdj you can ddrescue all that into partitions on this drive and still have space left over. That way you've got your original drives untouched, you've got a copy of everything on a fresh drive that's not going to die on you (touch wood), and you've got spare space left over. (Even better, a 4TB drive and then you can probably backup the array into the space left over!). That'll set you back just over £100 for a Seagate Ironwolf or similar. Second, as I say, work out where that data is hiding - I strongly suspect those drives have been partitioned. And lastly, go back to the wiki. The page you read was the last in a series - it would pay you to read the lot. https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid#When_Things_Go_Wrogn Note especially the utility lsdrv, which will tell the experts here straight away where your data has decided to play hide-and-seek. ESPECIALLY if you've ddrescued the data to a new drive, I suspect it will be a simple matter of "--assemble --force" and your array will back up and running in a flash - well, maybe not a flash, it's got to rebuild and sort itself out, but it'll be back and working. (And then, of course, if you have built a new raid with a bunch of partitions all on one disk, you need to backup the data, tear down the raid, and re-organise the disk(s) into a more sensible long-term configuration). Oh - and putting LVM on top of a raid is perfectly sensible behaviour. We have a problem with the raid - let's fix the raid and your LVM should just come straight back. Cheers, Wol