Re: [md PATCH 0/2] Fix problems with reshape on degraded raid5/6

[md PATCH 0/2] Fix problems with reshape on degraded raid5/6 · NeilBrown <hidden> · 2017-10-17
[md PATCH 1/2] raid5: Set R5_Expanded on parity devices as well as data. · NeilBrown <hidden> · 2017-10-17
[md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · NeilBrown <hidden> · 2017-10-17
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · Tomasz Majchrzak <hidden> · 2017-10-31
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · NeilBrown <hidden> · 2017-11-01
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · Tomasz Majchrzak <hidden> · 2017-11-02
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> · 2017-11-09
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · NeilBrown <hidden> · 2017-11-09
Re: [md PATCH 2/2] md: be cautious about using ->curr_resync_completed for ->recovery_offset · Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> · 2017-11-09
Re: [md PATCH 0/2] Fix problems with reshape on degraded raid5/6 · Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> · 2017-10-19

From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-10-19 03:06:33

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:18:36PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:

Reshape on a degraded array is supposed to work, but it
obviously hasn't been tested.
These two patches make at least one test case (reported by
Curt [off-list ref]) to work.

Applied, thanks!

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help