Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 4 authors, 2017-03-03

Re: [md PATCH 09/14] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments

From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-17 02:15:21

On Thu, Feb 16 2017, Jack Wang wrote:
2017-02-16 5:39 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown [off-list ref]:
quoted
raid10 currently repurposes bi_phys_segments on each
incoming bio to count how many r10bio was used to encode the
request.

We need to know when the number of attached r10bio reaches
zero to:
1/ call bio_endio() when all IO on the bio is finished
2/ decrement ->nr_pending so that resync IO can proceed.

Now that the bio has its own __bi_remaining counter, that
can be used instead. We can call bio_inc_remaining to
increment the counter and call bio_endio() every time an
r10bio completes, rather than only when bi_phys_segments
reaches zero.

This addresses point 1, but not point 2.  bio_endio()
doesn't (and cannot) report when the last r10bio has
finished, so a different approach is needed.

So: instead of counting bios in ->nr_pending, count r10bios.
i.e. every time we attach a bio, increment nr_pending.
Every time an r10bio completes, decrement nr_pending.

Normally we only increment nr_pending after first checking
that ->barrier is zero, or some other non-trivial tests and
possible waiting.  When attaching multiple r10bios to a bio,
we only need the tests and the waiting once.  After the
first increment, subsequent increments can happen
unconditionally as they are really all part of the one
request.

So introduce inc_pending() which can be used when we know
that nr_pending is already elevated.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 9258cbe233bb..6b4d8643c574 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -301,27 +301,18 @@ static void reschedule_retry(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
 static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
 {
        struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio;
-       int done;
        struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;

-       if (bio->bi_phys_segments) {
-               unsigned long flags;
-               spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-               bio->bi_phys_segments--;
-               done = (bio->bi_phys_segments == 0);
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
-       } else
-               done = 1;
        if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state))
                bio->bi_error = -EIO;
-       if (done) {
-               bio_endio(bio);
-               /*
-                * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device
-                * to go idle.
-                */
-               allow_barrier(conf);
-       }
+
+       /*
+        * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device
+        * to go idle.
+        */
+       allow_barrier(conf);
+       bio_endio(bio);
+
Hi Neil,

Why do you switch the order of above 2 lines, is there a reason
behind, I notice in raid1 you kept the order?
I cannot think why I would have done that.  It doesn't matter what
order they are in, but it does make sense to leave the order unchanged
unless there is a good reason.  I'll put it back.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help