Re: [md PATCH 09/14] md/raid10: stop using bi_phys_segments
From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-17 02:15:21
On Thu, Feb 16 2017, Jack Wang wrote:
2017-02-16 5:39 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown [off-list ref]:quoted
raid10 currently repurposes bi_phys_segments on each incoming bio to count how many r10bio was used to encode the request. We need to know when the number of attached r10bio reaches zero to: 1/ call bio_endio() when all IO on the bio is finished 2/ decrement ->nr_pending so that resync IO can proceed. Now that the bio has its own __bi_remaining counter, that can be used instead. We can call bio_inc_remaining to increment the counter and call bio_endio() every time an r10bio completes, rather than only when bi_phys_segments reaches zero. This addresses point 1, but not point 2. bio_endio() doesn't (and cannot) report when the last r10bio has finished, so a different approach is needed. So: instead of counting bios in ->nr_pending, count r10bios. i.e. every time we attach a bio, increment nr_pending. Every time an r10bio completes, decrement nr_pending. Normally we only increment nr_pending after first checking that ->barrier is zero, or some other non-trivial tests and possible waiting. When attaching multiple r10bios to a bio, we only need the tests and the waiting once. After the first increment, subsequent increments can happen unconditionally as they are really all part of the one request. So introduce inc_pending() which can be used when we know that nr_pending is already elevated. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <redacted> --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 9258cbe233bb..6b4d8643c574 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c@@ -301,27 +301,18 @@ static void reschedule_retry(struct r10bio *r10_bio) static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio) { struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio; - int done; struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private; - if (bio->bi_phys_segments) { - unsigned long flags; - spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags); - bio->bi_phys_segments--; - done = (bio->bi_phys_segments == 0); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags); - } else - done = 1; if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state)) bio->bi_error = -EIO; - if (done) { - bio_endio(bio); - /* - * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device - * to go idle. - */ - allow_barrier(conf); - } + + /* + * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device + * to go idle. + */ + allow_barrier(conf); + bio_endio(bio); +Hi Neil, Why do you switch the order of above 2 lines, is there a reason behind, I notice in raid1 you kept the order?
I cannot think why I would have done that. It doesn't matter what order they are in, but it does make sense to leave the order unchanged unless there is a good reason. I'll put it back. Thanks, NeilBrown
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 832 bytes