Thread (106 messages) 106 messages, 12 authors, 2016-10-28
STALE927d

[PATCH 52/54] md/raid10: Replace a seq_printf() call by seq_puts() in raid10_status()

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-06 09:52:29
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml
Subsystem: software raid (multiple disks) support, the rest · Maintainers: Song Liu, Yu Kuai, Linus Torvalds

From: Markus Elfring <redacted>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:41:09 +0200

The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 82d79f5..554b6d2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ static void raid10_status(struct seq_file *seq, struct mddev *mddev)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%s", rdev && test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) ? "U" : "_");
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	seq_printf(seq, "]");
+	seq_puts(seq, "]");
 }
 
 /* check if there are enough drives for
-- 
2.10.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help