[PATCH] dm: fix parameter to blk_delay_queue()

Second parameter to blk_delay_queue() must be in msec units not jiffies.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/dm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 1b2f96205361..17c63265a205 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c

@@ -2175,7 +2175,7 @@ static void dm_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 		     md_in_flight(md) && rq->bio && rq->bio->bi_vcnt == 1 &&
 		     md->last_rq_pos == pos && md->last_rq_rw == rq_data_dir(rq)) ||
 		    (ti->type->busy && ti->type->busy(ti))) {
-			blk_delay_queue(q, HZ / 100);
+			blk_delay_queue(q, 10);
 			return;
 		}
 

-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

On Fri, Jul 15 2016 at  9:27am -0400,
Tahsin Erdogan [off-list ref] wrote:

Second parameter to blk_delay_queue() must be in msec units not jiffies.

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <redacted>

This needs to be rebased against linux-next (or linux-dm.git's
'for-next') because the code in question has been moved out to dm-rq.c

But I'll gladly take care of it.

Your change seems fine, and in fact my intent was always to have it be
10 msec, see commit: d548b34b062b60

Curious that the initial "HZ / 10" (from Jens' commit 7eaceaccab) wasn't
expressed in terms of msecs either.

Anyway, thanks for the fix!

Mike

This needs to be rebased against linux-next (or linux-dm.git's
'for-next') because the code in question has been moved out to dm-rq.c

But I'll gladly take care of it.

Thanks Mike!