Re: [PATCH 1/2] dm: update table type check for dax
From: Mike Snitzer <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-29 00:41:31
Also in:
dm-devel, lkml, nvdimm
On Tue, Jun 28 2016 at 4:23pm -0400, Kani, Toshimitsu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 16:07 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 28 2016 at 3:37pm -0400, Toshi Kani [off-list ref] wrote::quoted
You said in the 0th header: "Patch 1 solves an error when lvremove is made to a snapshot device." I'm not seeing why this patch 1 fixes anything specific to snapshot device removal (but I can see why patch 2 makes snapshot creation "work"). I'll apply your 2nd patch and see if I can see what you mean. I actually see this error, without either of your 2 proposed patches applied, when I try to create a snapshot of a DAX capable LV: # lvcreate -s -n snap -L 100M pmem/lv device-mapper: reload ioctl on (253:7) failed: Invalid argument Failed to lock logical volume pmem/lv. Aborting. Manual intervention required. Jun 28 15:57:28 rhel-storage-02 kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: can't change device type after initial table load.Yes, patch 2 fixes this error. I have not looked into why lvremove does this, but lvremove to a snapshot device fails to reload DM table of "<dev>-lvsnap" device (which is marked as DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED) with DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED. Patch 1 fixes this error.
It looks like a strange intermediate state that lvm2 uses during snapshot removal. Full listing of snapshot related DM tables (before lvremove): pmem-lv-real: 0 6086656 linear 259:0 2048 pmem-lv: 0 6086656 snapshot-origin 253:5 pmem-snap-cow: 0 204800 linear 259:0 6088704 pmem-snap: 0 6086656 snapshot 253:5 253:6 P 8 When removing this snapshot we're wanting to be left with: pmem-lv: 0 6086656 linear 259:0 2048 I augmented the DM core error to be more expressive, resulting in: device-mapper: ioctl: 253:7: can't change device type (from 1 to 4) after initial table load. 1 is DM_TYPE_BIO_BASED and 4 is DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED -- which makes sense given the linear target is DM_TYPE_DAX_BIO_BASED. The previous DM table for 253:7 was: pmem-snap: 0 6086656 snapshot 253:5 253:6 P 8 The intermediate table that lvm2 is trying to load for 253:7 is: 0 204800 linear 259:0 6088704 (this linear target was previously pmem-snap-cow)
I think it also generally makes sense to allow this case.
You're probably right but I need to think about it a little bit more.