Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-05-04

Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

From: Mike Christie <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-04 17:51:59
Also in: dm-devel, linux-bcache, linux-block, linux-btrfs, linux-ext4, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-scsi, linux-xfs, lkml, ocfs2-devel

On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
mchristi@redhat.com writes:
quoted
The following patches begin to cleanup the request->cmd_flags and
bio->bi_rw mess. We currently use cmd_flags to specify the operation,
attributes and state of the request. For bi_rw we use it for similar
info and also the priority but then also have another bi_flags field
for state. At some point, we abused them so much we just made cmd_flags
64 bits, so we could add more.

The following patches seperate the operation (read, write discard,
flush, etc) from cmd_flags/bi_rw.

This patchset was made against linux-next from today April 15
(git tag next-20160415).

I put a git tree here:
https://github.com/mikechristie/linux-kernel.git
The patches are in the op branch.
Hi, Mike,

That git tree doesn't seem to exist.  I did manage to apply your patch
set on top of next-20160415, though.

So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems
I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I
did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression.

What FS were you using?
- git clone fails
- yum segfaults

In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two
above. I have this fixed in the next version.
- many blktrace/blkparse issues, including incorrect cpu recorded in
  traces, null task names, and blkparse outputting nothing for a trace
  file several gigabytes in size.
I will double check for these issues.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help