Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2016-05-03

Re: Help needed: array inactive after grow attempt

From: Andread Mayrhoff <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-28 19:50:24

I might add

~/tmp # mdadm --stop /dev/md127
mdadm: stopped /dev/md127
~/tmp # mdadm --assemble --scan
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
        Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-file

Thanks for helping me out of this...

Am 2016-04-28 21:27, schrieb Andread Mayrhoff:
Hello,

I believe I need some help from an mdadm expert.

I tried to add a disk to an existing RAID5-array (/dev/md127) that
consisted of 5 disks: /dev/sd[bcdef]1
The system is a 4.5.2-2-kernel, x86_64-architecture, mdadm 3.3.1.
I attempted to add partition /dev/sdg1 to that array, in an attempt to
create a 6-disk-RAID5-array.
To achieve that goal, I typed "mdadm --add /dev/md127 /dev/sdg1".
As I found that working, I attempted to grow the array by typing
"mdadm --grow /dev/md127 --raid-devices=6".

I left my machine, and when I returned, I found it had been switched
off by my... ahem, anyway, it had been switched off.

I powered it on again, "cat /proc/mdstat" returned
quoted
quoted
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md127 : inactive sdg1[9](S) sdf1[8](S) sdc1[5](S) sdb1[6](S)
sde1[4](S) sdd1[7](S)
      17578345656 blocks super 1.0

unused devices: <none>
<<

mdadm --detail /dev/md127 returns
quoted
quoted
/dev/md127:
        Version : 1.0
     Raid Level : raid0
  Total Devices : 6
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

          State : inactive

  Delta Devices : 1, (-1->0)
      New Level : raid5
     New Layout : left-symmetric
  New Chunksize : 128K

           Name : n54l:raid5.11111111.eu
           UUID : b120f4d9:d1ba5648:e1359c5d:7a36372e
         Events : 60868

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice

       -       8       17        -        /dev/sdb1
       -       8       33        -        /dev/sdc1
       -       8       49        -        /dev/sdd1
       -       8       65        -        /dev/sde1
       -       8       81        -        /dev/sdf1
       -       8       97        -        /dev/sdg1
<<

Now, before I do anything extreme like unplugging that disk again or
forcing a recreate, could an expert suggest the next logical step I
should do. I know this sounds pretty defensive, but rather than
playing "Raid-hero with an erased set of disks" I'd go along with
"Raid-idiot that needed experts' advice which is why he still's got
all his data".

Thanks for your advice!



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" 
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help