Re: WD Red vs Black drives for RAID1
From: John Stoffel <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-16 19:52:37
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Phil" == Phil Turmel [off-list ref] writes:
Phil> On 11/16/2015 11:28 AM, John Stoffel wrote:
quoted
Guys, I'm starting to get tons of errors on my various mixed 1 and 2Tb drives I have in a bunch of RAID 1 mirrors, generally triple mirrors. It's time to start replacing them and I think I want to either go with the WD Black 4Tb or the WD Red 4Tb drives. And with a pair of 500Gb SSDs to use with lvmcache for speedup. Any comments?
Phil> The data sheet for the Blacks implies that they do *not* have Phil> TLER, also known as ERC. This is vital for proper operation Phil> out-of-the-box in any Linux Raid environment, with the exception Phil> of raid0. So I like the 5 year warranttee on the blacks, but it does look like the REDs are the way to go. And I think I'll also go with splitting my data between seagate and WD and possibly Hitachi (I know, they've been bought by WD) to make a three way RAID 1 mirror across 4Tb drives. Yes, I'd get more room out of RAID5, but I'm not that silly, and I don't need to move to 4 x 4Tb in RAID6 either. Who knows... still pricing things out. John