Re: Fwd: Installing Linux directly onto RAID6 Array...........
From: Another Sillyname <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-24 10:07:31
But reading this..... https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID_superblock_formats#The_version-1_Superblock_Format it makes a sound argument for the metadata superblock being at the beginning of the drive.......in a nutshell the kernel can 'construct' the md device easier if the metadata is at the beginning....as well as data resilience issues in the case of a crash. On 24 May 2015 at 10:46, Mikael Abrahamsson [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015, Another Sillyname wrote:quoted
I suspect you're correct in that I'll end up with the boot partitions being in RAID1 and the data in RAID6, however I am seriously considering having the boot in RAID6 as well...if I can integrate the mdadm.conf into the initramfs properly I can't see a reason not to do this?The initramfs is usually located on the boot partition. A raid1 partition with a filesystem can be read by the bootloader even if the bootloader doesn't understand to start the raid first. This is not possible with raid6. So /boot is usually raid1.quoted
Had a look at the metadata=0.9 option but reading the info on mdadm metadata I think I'd prefer to have the metadata at the start of the drive, also it looks like metadata=1.2 has extra functionality that I may want to use later.Look at v1.0 superblock, it has the same functionality but stores the superblock at the end. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se