Re: Riad scrub generated errors, should I worry?
From: Thomas Fjellstrom <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-02 17:43:34
On Mon 02 Mar 2015 04:22:00 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Wilson, Jonathan wrote:quoted
While the monthly scrub was running the following errors (at the bottom of the post, copied from syslog) were issued.As soon as you get UNC, it's the drive reporting that it can't successfully read a sector. Usually this sector is then reported as "pending" in your SMART output. Since the log you provided shows a lot of sectors being corrected and you after that have 0 pending sectors on the drive, I'd say you are now fine. I would run a new scrub manually in a few days just to check, but you might be fine going forward. There is no really good way to know, but generally, a drive that throws a bunch of UNC should be monitored so this isn't becoming a common problem. I tend to replace drives that have thrown these kinds of errors if it happens on any kind of regular basis.
Dumb question, but after pending, I assume they go into the reallocated column? I think after a certain number of those, you should start thinking about a replacement. Like with my recent issues, I had two drives with a few too many reallocated sectors. One was over 16k and the other was over 32k. They still "work", but I replaced them with WD Reds anyhow. Another drive seemed to max out the start-stop count field at 65536. Hah. No more cheap desktop seagates in raid for this fellow. -- Thomas Fjellstrom thomas@fjellstrom.ca