Re: [PATCH] md: fix raid5 livelock

From
Jes Sorensen <hidden>
Date
2015-01-29 17:17:49
Also in
dm-devel
NeilBrown [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:06:20 +0100 Heinz Mauelshagen [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
From: Heinz Mauelshagen <redacted>

Hi Neil,

the reconstruct write optimization in raid5, function fetch_block causes
livelocks in LVM raid4/5 tests.

Test scenarios:
the tests wait for full initial array resynchronization before making a 
filesystem
on the raid4/5 logical volume, mounting it, writing to the filesystem 
and failing
one physical volume holding a raiddev.

In short, we're seeing livelocks on fully synchronized raid4/5 arrays 
with a failed device.

This patch fixes the issue but likely in a suboptimnal way.

Do you think there is a better solution to avoid livelocks on 
reconstruct writes?

Regards,
Heinz

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <redacted>
Tested-by: Jon Brassow <redacted>
Tested-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <redacted>

---
  drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c1b0d52..0fc8737 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2915,7 +2915,7 @@ static int fetch_block(struct stripe_head *sh, 
struct stripe_head_state *s,
              (s->failed >= 1 && fdev[0]->toread) ||
              (s->failed >= 2 && fdev[1]->toread) ||
              (sh->raid_conf->level <= 5 && s->failed && fdev[0]->towrite &&
-             (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) || 
test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) &&
+             (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) || 
test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state) || s->non_overwrite) &&
               !test_bit(R5_OVERWRITE, &fdev[0]->flags)) ||
              ((sh->raid_conf->level == 6 ||
                sh->sector >= sh->raid_conf->mddev->recovery_cp)

That is a bit heavy handed, but knowing that fixes the problem helps a lot.

I think the problem happens when processes a non-overwrite write to a failed
device.

fetch_block() should, in that case, pre-read all of the working device, but
since

	      (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) || test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) &&

was added, it sometimes doesn't.  The root problem is that
handle_stripe_dirtying is getting confused because neither rmw or rcw seem to
work, so it doesn't start the chain of events to set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE.

The following (which is against mainline) might fix it.  Can you test?

Thanks,
NeilBrown
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index c1b0d52bfcb0..793cf2861e97 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3195,6 +3195,10 @@ static void handle_stripe_dirtying(struct r5conf *conf,
 					  (unsigned long long)sh->sector,
 					  rcw, qread, test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state));
 	}
+	if (rcw > disks && rmw > disks &&
+	    !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
+		set_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
+
 	/* now if nothing is locked, and if we have enough data,
 	 * we can start a write request
 	 */

This code really really needs to be tidied up and commented better!!!
Neil,

Since this one seems to do the trick, will you be pushing it into you
tree anytime soon?

Cheers,
Jes
Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, last reply 2015-01-29
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help