Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2014-10-21

Re: dm raid: pointer math issue in super_sync()

From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-21 12:57:29
Also in: dm-devel, kernel-janitors

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:48:26AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
quoted
-	memset(sb + sizeof(*sb), 0, rdev->sb_size - sizeof(*sb));
+	memset(sb + 1, 0, rdev->sb_size - sizeof(*sb));
 
 	sb->magic = cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC);
 	sb->features = cpu_to_le32(0);	/* No features yet */
Not following... sizeof(*sb) != sizeof(sb).  So I'm not seeing a
problem.

Nor am I seeing how you think sb + 1 is equivalent to what Heinz
intended (zero the memory following the sizeof(struct dm_raid_superblock)).
It's pointer math.

sizeof(*sb) is 512.

"sb + sizeof(*sb)" is the same as (void *)sb + 512 * 512.
"sb + 1" is the same as (void *)sb + 512.

regards,
dan carpenter
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help