Re: dm raid: pointer math issue in super_sync()
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-21 12:57:29
Also in:
dm-devel, kernel-janitors
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-21 12:57:29
Also in:
dm-devel, kernel-janitors
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:48:26AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
quoted
- memset(sb + sizeof(*sb), 0, rdev->sb_size - sizeof(*sb)); + memset(sb + 1, 0, rdev->sb_size - sizeof(*sb)); sb->magic = cpu_to_le32(DM_RAID_MAGIC); sb->features = cpu_to_le32(0); /* No features yet */Not following... sizeof(*sb) != sizeof(sb). So I'm not seeing a problem. Nor am I seeing how you think sb + 1 is equivalent to what Heinz intended (zero the memory following the sizeof(struct dm_raid_superblock)).
It's pointer math. sizeof(*sb) is 512. "sb + sizeof(*sb)" is the same as (void *)sb + 512 * 512. "sb + 1" is the same as (void *)sb + 512. regards, dan carpenter