On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Gionatan Danti wrote:

As you can find, no error was reported, and I don't find anything 
suspicious in dmesg. At least, this should prove that article as this 
[1] are quite wrong.

Why do you think that's wrong? 10^-14 is what the vendor guarantees. I 
have had drives with worse performance (after a couple of months I had 
several UNC sectors without reading much).

Your claim about the article being wrong is the same as saying that the 
risk reported of getting into a car accident is wrong because you've 
driven that amount of kilometers but haven't been in an accident yet.

This is statistics, marketing and warranty, not guaranteed behavior.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se