Re: Understanding raid array status: Active vs Clean
From: George Duffield <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-28 18:05:18
Anyone able to provide some insight please? On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:08 PM, George Duffield [off-list ref] wrote:
I recently created a raid 5 array under Arch Linux running on a HP
Microserver using pretty much the same topography as I do under Ubuntu
Server. The creation process went fine and the array is accessible,
however, from the outset it's only ever reported status as Active
rather than Clean.
After creating the array, watch -d cat /proc/mdstat returned:
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdc1[2] sde1[5] sdb1[1] sdd1[3]
11720536064 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2
[5/5] [UUUUU]
bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk
unused devices: <none>
which to me pretty much looks like the array sync completed successfully.
I then updated the config file, assembled the array and formatted it using:
mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm.conf
mdadm --assemble --scan
mkfs.ext4 -v -L offsitestorage -b 4096 -E stride=128,stripe-width=512 /dev/md0
mdadm --detail /dev/md0 returns:
/dev/md0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Thu Apr 17 01:13:52 2014
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 11720536064 (11177.57 GiB 12001.83 GB)
Used Dev Size : 2930134016 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Thu Apr 17 18:55:01 2014
State : active
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K
Name : audioliboffsite:0 (local to host audioliboffsite)
UUID : aba348c6:8dc7b4a7:4e282ab5:40431aff
Events : 11306
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 1 0 active sync /dev/sda1
1 8 17 1 active sync /dev/sdb1
2 8 33 2 active sync /dev/sdc1
3 8 49 3 active sync /dev/sdd1
5 8 65 4 active sync /dev/sde1
So, I'm now left wondering why the state of the array isn't "clean"?
Is it normal for arrays to show a state of "active" instead of clean
under Arch - is it simply a matter of Arch is packaged with a more
recent version of mdadm than Ubuntu Server?
Thx