Re: Soft RAID and EFI systems
From: Francis Moreau <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-04 08:53:09
On 02/04/2014 09:48 AM, David Brown wrote:
On 04/02/14 09:41, Francis Moreau wrote:quoted
On 02/02/2014 11:57 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:quoted
On 02/02/2014 05:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:quoted
On Feb 2, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Francis Moreau [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
That's funny because one of the reasons I want to use UEFI firmware is to get rid of grub (I don't like it and the way it has become such a bloated beast): since /boot is vfat and has its own partition, I prefer use a much simpler bootloader such as gummyboot.Ditching the bootloader is possible: http://kroah.com/log/blog/2013/09/02/booting-a-self-signed-linux-kernel/Well yeah it's possible but not currently usable IMHO. It means that you need to build your own kernel, include in this kernel the initramfs image and you need to redo the whole process if you want to change a single option in the kernel command line.quoted
It seems to me that you should be able to create a raid1 v1.0 MD array of your EFI support partitions, and put the combined and signed kernel/initramfs onto it (mirrored to all member drives).Are both v0.9 and v1.0 MD put their metadata at the end of a partition ? I thought only v0.9 would do that.Yes, it is only 0.9 format that is at the end of the partition. This means that a plain raid1 mirror (with as many disks as you like, as long as they are simple mirrors and not raid10) looks just like a normal partition for other tools. As long as it is read-only, tools that are not raid-aware can use it. For example, grub and lilo can happily boot from a 0.9 metadata raid1 array just like from a normal partition. (Actually, modern grub understands a lot of md raid formats.) The same thing should apply to EFI, as long as it does not attempt to write to the partition.
hmm I need to check if EFI specifies that the ESP is never written by the firmware. If not it might be risky to rely on it.