Re: Is partition alignment needed for RAID partitions ?
From: Pieter De Wit <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-30 18:32:26
Hi Stan,
(3407028224 sectors * 512 bytes per sector) / 524288 (chunk bytes) = 3327176 chunks
Right - more for clarity, these are the 512 byte sectors, not the 4k ones (otherwise I would have had a 12 TB drive :) )
Please show the exact iostat command line you are using and the output.
iostat -x 1
quoted
Also, there is no other disk usage in the system. All the data is currently on the NAS (except system "stuff" for a quite firewall) I just spotted another thing, the two drives are on the same SATA controller, from rescan-scsi-bus: Scanning for device 3 0 0 0 ... OLD: Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD20EARX-008 Rev: 51.0 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 Scanning for device 3 0 1 0 ... OLD: Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00 Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD20EARX-008 Rev: 51.0 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 Would it be better to move these apart ? I remember IDE used to have this issue, but I also recall SATA "fixed" that.This isn't the problem. Even if both drives were connected via a plain old 33MHz 132MB/s PCI SATA card you'd still be capable of 120MB/s throughput, 60MB/s per drive.quoted
Thanks again,You're welcome. Eventually you get to the bottom of this.
And the email :) I now have the drive with no data on them, so I can even run write tests. I am going to start with the usual "dd" tests, any other that you would like to see ? Cheers, Pieter