just one mark
on the other thread, decent drive = enterprise level, a home level
decent drive is samsung 840 pro (if i'm not wrong), i used ocz vetex2
without problem but i don't know if it's really a good drive, but
worked in my workload...

2013/10/9 David Brown [off-list ref]:

On 09/10/13 14:31, Andy Smith wrote:

quoted

Hello,

Due to increasing load of random read IOPS I am considering using 8
SSDs and md in my next server, instead of 8 SATA HDDs with
battery-backed hardware RAID. I am thinking of using Crucial m500s.

Are there any gotchas to be aware of? I haven't much experience with
SSDs.

If these were normal HDDs then (aside from small partitions for
/boot) I'd just RAID-10 for the main bulk of the storage. Is there
any reason not to do that with SSDs currently?

I think I read somewhere that offline TRIM is only supported by md
for RAID-1, is that correct? If so, should I be finding a way to use
four pairs of RAID-1s, or does it not matter?

Any insights appreciated.

Cheers,
Andy

For two hard disks, raid10 (with either f2 or o2 layout - n2 is almost
identical to normal raid1) can be a lot faster than raid1, because you
get the striping for big data (especially large reads), you get the
faster read throughput because your data is on the fast outer edge of
the disk, and your read latency is better because your head movement is
smaller.  Your writes are a bit slower because they are scattered about
the disk.

But for two SSDs, raid10 (f2, o2) has far fewer benefits because you
have no head movement - it is only large reads that can be faster.  If
you need IOPS - and presumably multiple parallel accesses - this is no
help.  raid10 has extra complexity and thus extra latency (which will
not be noticeably with HDs, but might be with SSDs), and limitations on
resizing and reshaping.

Extrapolating to 8 disks, I think therefore 4 sets of raid1 pair is
likely to be faster.  As to what you should do with these sets, that
depends on the application.  XFS over a linear join might be your best
bet - raid0 will work but you probably want a large chunk size because
you want to avoid striped reads and writes in order to get high IOPs.

Don't worry too much about TRIM if your SSDs are decent and you have
plenty of overprovisioning, but offline TRIM is worth doing when
supported.  (Never use online TRIM.)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Roberto Spadim