Re: mdadm >= 3.0 - udev test rule
From: Hristo Chonov <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-09 09:08:33
yeah, you are right I had to check the man pages of new udev versions..
But PROGRAM="/bin/test -f md/array_state" will be true if the file
exists and it will go to md_end.
So I guess the proper way to do it will be to introduce a new label
for example something like this:
# container devices have a metadata version of e.g. 'external:ddf' and
# never leave state 'inactive'
ATTR{md/metadata_version}=="external:[A-Za-z]*",
ATTR{md/array_state}=="inactive", GOTO="md_ignore_state"
PROGRAM="/bin/test -f md/array_state" , ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0", GOTO="md_test"
GOTO="md_end"
LABEL="md_test"
ATTR{md/array_state}=="|clear|inactive", ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0", GOTO="md_end"
LABEL="md_ignore_state"
I am not sure it if will work with just a single action on line like
GOTO="md_end" but my idea is if PROGRAM is false (the file doesn't
exists) then it will not jump to "md_test" and goes to the next line
which points a jump to "md_end".
Is this going to work?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Martin Wilck [off-list ref] wrote:On 10/08/2013 02:12 PM, Hristo Chonov wrote:quoted
Hello, I have just a simple question about the udev rule: TEST!="md/array_state", GOTO="md_end" or in the last two releases with the systemd support: TEST!="md/array_state", ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0", GOTO="md_end". We are running a XenSever 6.2 system which is based on CentOS 5.7 with included an old version of udev: udev-095. This version doesn't support the ATTR keyword so I am going to swap it with the old one SYSFS, but it appears that udev doesn't recognize as well the TEST keyword, so I am wondering what exactly this rule is there for? Is it checking if "md/array_state" appears somewhere in the attributes and if not it jumps to "md_end"?from mdadm(8): TEST{octal mode mask} Test the existence of a file. An octal mode mask can be specified if needed. So, this checks if the file "/sys/class/block/md$X/md/array_state" exists, and exits otherwise.quoted
And do you have any idea how the rule should be rewritten for older versions of udev?It could probably be done with PROGRAM="/bin/test -f md/array_state" or the like (not tested). Martin
-- Hristo Chonov kleine Hochstraße 4 60313, Frankfurt am Main Mobile: 0176 55 33 19 83 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html