Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2013-10-21

Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match

From: Francis Moreau <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-23 07:30:10

Hello Martin

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Martin Wilck [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

I have spent a few days thinking about the problem of incremental
container assembly when disk sequence numbers (aka event counters) don't
match, and how mdadm/mdmon should behave in various situations.
Before I start coding on this, I'd like to get your opinion - I may be
overlooking something  important.
I was really suprised to see that this functionnality needs to be
implemented since in my understanding, it's the most important one, at
least for RAID1.

Isn't this already implemented for IMSM ? If so can't we use the same strategy ?

If not, isn't dmraid supporting it ? If so can't we use the same strategy ?

Thanks
-- 
Francis
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help