On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:12:50AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
[...]

Fair enough.  I was thinking in the context of making raid6check part of the
default install.  I wouldn't want to do that until it was more "user
friendly".  I also wouldn't want to do it until he code had stabilized.  So
your idea fits perfectly.

Hi Neil,

seems reasonable, this discussion was exactly
triggered in order to understand what is missing
and what should be done for "raid6check" in
order to be part of the official "mdadm" binary set.

So, to sum it up:

1) 4K block size resolution for processing
2) Verbosity under controll

I guess these are the open points.

Thanks,

bye,

pg

Thanks,
NeilBrown

-- 

piergiorgio