Re: Mdadm server eating drives
From: Phil Turmel <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-14 21:30:46
From: Phil Turmel <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-14 21:30:46
On 06/14/2013 05:25 PM, Phil Turmel wrote:
On 06/14/2013 05:20 PM, Barrett Lewis wrote:
quoted
Is there any reason not to run "e2fsck -y /dev/md0"?An fsck is often needed after one of these crises. So, yes.
After wrapping my head around the grammar... *No*, no reason to not run fsck. :-) Phil