Re: Kernel 3.7.9 RAID6 hot replace success
From: Keith Keller <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-06 02:21:27
From: Keith Keller <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-06 02:21:27
On 2013-03-05, Brad Campbell [off-list ref] wrote:
I do keep a permanent spare drive, but with 3 arrays I manually allocate it in the rare event it is required. This drive had not failed out of the array, so the spare sat idle until I proactively replaced the dodgy drive.--
Are you using the spare-group attribute of arrays in mdadm.conf? If so, how well has it worked in your scenario? --keith -- kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us