Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2013-02-01

Re: Raid 5 to 6 migration

From: Phil Turmel <hidden>
Date: 2013-02-01 22:04:29

On 02/01/2013 01:49 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Phil Turmel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 02/01/2013 01:16 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
quoted
--layout=preserve will make it an order of magnitude faster. Read "man mdadm"
for more details. (And "man md" to learn about things in general.)
But will leave the array "unbalanced"--the 7th drive will never be used
for reads in normal (non-degraded) operation--reducing read performance.
Does this option mean, in effect, the 7th disk is just a parity disk? So, sorta like a hybrid RAID 5/RAID4.
Yes, with just the Q left on the 7th disk.  The remainder of the array
is the normal raid5 stripe.  See the manpage for the layout
"left-symmetric-6".

Phil
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help