Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-11

Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface

From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-20 23:42:00
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:33:29PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
From: Michael Wang <redacted>

This patch replaces list_for_each_continue_rcu() with
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to save a few lines
of code and allow removing list_for_each_continue_rcu().

Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <redacted>
Getting rid of list_for_each_continue_rcu() would indeed be a good thing!

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/md/bitmap.c |    9 +++------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
index 15dbe03..b160828 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
@@ -163,20 +163,17 @@ static struct md_rdev *next_active_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mdde
 	 * As devices are only added or removed when raid_disk is < 0 and
 	 * nr_pending is 0 and In_sync is clear, the entries we return will
 	 * still be in the same position on the list when we re-enter
-	 * list_for_each_continue_rcu.
+	 * list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu.
 	 */
-	struct list_head *pos;
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (rdev == NULL)
 		/* start at the beginning */
-		pos = &mddev->disks;
+		rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
 	else {
 		/* release the previous rdev and start from there. */
 		rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
-		pos = &rdev->same_set;
 	}
-	list_for_each_continue_rcu(pos, &mddev->disks) {
-		rdev = list_entry(pos, struct md_rdev, same_set);
+	list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
 		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
 		    !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)) {
 			/* this is a usable devices */
-- 
1.7.4.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help