Re: [RFE] Please, add optional RAID1 feature (= chunk checksums) to make it more robust

From
Jaromir Capik <hidden>
Date
2012-07-20 20:44:22
Reply to
Roberto Spadim, 2012-07-20
yeah for a 'fast' solution moving from one file system to another
that
works with theses checks can help you, while we check if this is
usefull or not

IMHO, if we implement this, we should implement outside any today
raid
levels, this should be done between device and filesystem, in others
words:

we should implement this to work like:
DISKS - (OUR NEW SILENT ERROR SECURITY SYSTEM LEVEL, 1 PER DEVICE) -
TODAY RAID LEVELS - FILESYSTEMS

or

DISKS - RAIDS LEVELS - (OUR NEW SILENT ERROR SECURITY SYSTEM LEVEL, 1
PER DEVICE) - FILESYSTEM

or

DISK - (OUR NEW SILENT ERROR SECURITY SYSTEM LEVEL, 1 PER DEVICE) -
FILESYSTEM


using this, we "could give more security" to usb pendrives for
example, and any block device (network block device, DRBD, or
anyother
block device in linux)
Well ... it looks more modular, easier and could have more usecases.
You're probably right at this point. Dracut maintainers would kill
us both, but that's a different story.
I'm only missing that possibility of immediate resyncing of the data
when a corruption is detected. That's probably the only thing, that
would be nice to have directly in the RAID layer (and could/should
be also optional). 

J.
Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 8 authors, last reply 2012-07-21
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help