majianpeng [off-list ref] writes:
On 2012-07-27 22:21 Jeff Moyer [off-list ref] Wrote:
quoted
majianpeng [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
When exec bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero.But after calling bio_add_page,
it will use bi_rw.
Fox example, in functiion __bio_add_page,it will call merge_bvec_fn().
The merge_bvec_fn of raid456 will use the bi_rw to judge the merge.
quoted
quoted
if ((bvm->bi_rw & 1) == WRITE)
return biovec->bv_len; /* always allow writes to be mergeable */
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <redacted>
Good catch. How did you find this? Did you experience data corruption
as a result of this oversight, reduced performance due to missed merge
opportunities, or did you just notice it in reviewing the code?
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <redacted>
Sorry for late to reply. When i analysed the performance of raid5, i found this bug.
OK, thanks. In the future, it would be good to include that information
in the patch description.
Cheers,
Jeff