Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2012-07-16

Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] raid5: For write performance, remove REQ_SYNC when write was odirect.

From: majianpeng <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-16 06:41:50
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On 2012-07-16 13:40 NeilBrown [off-list ref] Wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:31:55 +0800 majianpeng [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In commit e9c7469bb4f502dafc092166201bea1ad5fc0fbf:
Tejun Heo introduced "implment REQ_FLUSH/FUA support".
But for direct-write-blocks, it maybe for other purpose which like the
regular file.
And this flag will set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE which decreaed the change
to full write.

But this patch remove REQ_SYNC only judging the WRITE_ODIRECT,it will
contail regular file.So it maybe not correctly.
How can difference odriect_write between regular file or block file?
Hi,
I think you are saying the when REQ_SYNC is used with O_DIRECT writes it is
having a negative effect on throughput because it allows the stripe to be
processed immediately without waiting for more requests to be added to the
stripe.

Normal 'sync' requests use WRITE_SYNC which includes "REQ_NOIDLE" which means
  /* don't anticipate more IO after this one */
O_DIRECT request use WRITE_ODIRECT which does not include this flag.
Using REQ_NOIDEL to difference odirect and sync.Why not using:
 +	if (bi->bi_rw & WRITE_ODIRECT)
 +		bi->bi_rw &= ~REQ_SYNC;

The flag WRITE_ODIRECT is only used in odirect-write.
So maybe we should simply change raid5 to only set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE if
REQ_NOIDLE is set on the bio.  I think this would have the same effect as
what you are trying to achieve.

Could you please try that and see if it has the desired effect on
performance?
I tested and the performance is the same.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Thanks,
NeilBrown

i.e. something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index d56d74d..2d72a57 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4178,7 +4178,7 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
			finish_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap, &w);
			set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
			clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
-			if ((bi->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC) &&
+			if ((bi->bi_rw & REQ_NOIDLE) &&
			    !test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
				atomic_inc(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
			release_stripe_plug(mddev, sh);

quoted
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <redacted>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 04348d7..8d2d4d1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -4010,6 +4010,9 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 	     chunk_aligned_read(mddev,bi))
 		return;
 
+	if (bi->bi_rw & WRITE_ODIRECT)
+		bi->bi_rw &= ~REQ_SYNC;
+
 	logical_sector = bi->bi_sector & ~((sector_t)STRIPE_SECTORS-1);
 	last_sector = bi->bi_sector + (bi->bi_size>>9);
 	bi->bi_next = NULL;
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help