Re: Is this enough for us to have triple-parity RAID?
From: Alex <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-22 03:14:16
Hi Piergiorgio, Just being curious, any mathematical improvement in Reed-Solomon's code like the RS(96,64) you mentioned? The calculation of RS involves arbitrary multiplication in a Galois field and table look-up has to be used. Has that already changed? Cheers, Alex On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Piergiorgio Sartor [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Peter,quoted
Perhaps it was not clear that "use self repairing coding similarly to Parchive" does not mean the same as "use Parchive".sorry, I understood you meant storing somewhere files with parities.quoted
Applying self repairing coding to RAID might be easier to imagine considering of a RAID volume as a directory of stripe-sized files.Exactly, but as far as I know this is the same as any N parities RAID. I mean, the mathematics and algorithm behind should be exactly the same... bye, -- piergiorgio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html