Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 5 authors, 2012-01-09

Re: SMART, RAID and real world experience of failures.

flat view

From: Phil Turmel <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-09 16:37:19

On 01/09/2012 09:50 AM, Peter Grandi wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
I got a SMART error email yesterday from my home server with a 4
x 1Tb RAID6. [ ... ]
quoted
quoted
quoted
That's an (euphemism alert) imaginative setup. Why not a 4
drive RAID10? In general there are vanishingly few cases in
which RAID6 makes sense, and in the 4 drive case a RAID10
makes even more sense than usual. Especially with the really
cool setup options that MD RAID10 offers.
quoted
In this case, the raid6 can suffer the loss of any two drives
and continue operating.  Raid10 cannot, unless you give up
more space for triple redundancy.
When I see arguments like this I am sometimes (euphemism alert)
enthused by their (euphemism alert) profundity. A defense of a
4-drive RAID6 is a particularly compelling example, and this
type of (euphemism alert) astute observation even more so.
<< plonk >>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help